Court rules that Australians can ignore overseas arbitration
Clauses in voyage charterparties purporting to set arbitration venues overseas instead of in Australia were rendered void by a decision of the Federal Court last Friday.
Photo - Shutterstock
In the case of Dampskibsselskabet Norden v Beach Building & Civil Group [2012] FCA 696 it was held that voyage charterparties fall within the definition of “sea carriage documents,” under the Commonwealth’s section 11 of the Carriage of Goods by...
If you are already a subscriber, please sign in below. If you're not a subscriber and would like to experience the full benefits of Lloyd's List DCN with a 14 day trial, please click here. Alternatively, click here to subscribe.This full article is available to Lloyd's List DCN subscribers only.
| Tweet |
Daily Top Stories
- Increase in wine imports
- INTERNATIONAL: Fresh orders throw crude tanker upturn into further doubt
- INTERNATIONAL: Antwerp gears up for 18,000 teu leviathans
- INTERNATIONAL: Private security company rethinks its business model
- RCL joins ANL on Asia-Australia route
- ASIA: Scrap rates prove resilient as monsoon period approaches
- ASIA: Jaya down but not out
- ASIA: Pondering the next move in the Cosco shuffle
- Port managers did not inspect or maintain mooring lines: ATSB





